我們該去厭惡貴族嗎?

圖片來自網路

為什麼不管是東方,還是西方,世界上的每個角落貴族都無處不在?貴族到底是什麼?與貴族相對應的平民又是什麼?當中國東漢中葉累世經學的士族攏斷整個統治階級時,歐亞大陸的彼岸,羅馬帝國的統治權也已被元老院貴族所把持,而在這之前古老的印度早已出現了非常森嚴的種姓制度,這種種的社會共同普遍現象到底訴說這什麼?我們又該怎樣看待呢!

圖片來自網路

從古書中我們可以得知齊桓公的宰相管仲是贊成貴族產生的,管仲在當宰相後明確的把士、農、工、商分區管理,並且規定每家累世當士人、當農人、當工人、當商人,職業要永久固定,子孫不能因為興趣在敲敲打打喜歡做工藝、興趣在詩、書、禮、樂看聖賢書、興趣在算數賣東西而能夠與家庭原始的職業分道揚鑣,而去做自己喜歡的職業,可能大家會覺得管仲為什麼要這麼搞,不僅剝奪了個人自由,還摧毀了整個社會的人才流動,管仲這樣治理對嗎?但小編我要跟諸位講,就是因為這樣子的家族職業固定,使得一個家族的專業在每個家族成員裡是很容易進入軌道的,而間接的使國家富強,舉個例子,一個商人家族出生的孩子從小時候就在大人買賣的口語中成長,耳濡目染下這位孩兒還需要從什麼商業書籍中另外學習買賣本領嗎?跟本無師自通了,這樣子累世下來就有點成了現今的專業特區一樣,在專業的領域,家族的掌門人不是只有擁有自身的專業在,還擁有更多的是好幾代人的專業經驗與家族的認同感,這種力量不僅是會使身為家族一份子的個人說到自己家族是會驕傲的,而在整個國家裡更能發揮自己的專業到極點,因為這份專業已經不只是個人的專業與奮鬥,而是整個家族累世的智慧結晶,從另外一個角度看,因為對家族的認同感強,所以對祖國的認同也會間接提升,造成的結果就是國富民強,大家願意盡自己的一臂之力來維護自己的國家,而這是社會人才流動頻繁不能達到的,所以齊國在管仲的治理下得到了富強是很容易解釋的事,而這種士、農、工、商的職業固定不就是貴族的概念嗎?所以貴族真的不好嗎?

圖片來自網路

大家可能要問了貴族、貴族,我剛剛只講了「族」,還沒講「貴」呢!一個只有「族」,沒有「貴」的「族」跟本不算貴族吧!沒錯這樣子還不算貴族,但其實只要做到「族」的連貫性與固定性,「貴」只是早晚的事,因為這種連貫性與固定性的「族」在一般的社會競爭下必定與那種單槍匹馬的人更勝一籌,不管是在人脈或者專業方面上都是如此,所以必定得到「貴」,而成為「貴族」,白話就是「能力強大的家族」的意思,而不是「富貴的家族」的意思,因為身為貴族的一份子並不是一種享福,而是一種責任,一種要繼續強大,不能中斷或衰敗的責任感,就是因為如此古代中國的皇帝雖然是萬人之上的貴族,但時常還要戰戰競競懼怕篡位者的原因。

圖片來自網路

在世界各地貴族的產生是必然的,因為在歷史的演進中用進廢退是必然的,能力強大的家族必定勝過單槍匹馬的對手成為把持整個社會的統治者,所以何須厭惡貴族,,還不如向貴族看齊,因為貴族得勢的過程是值得我們學習的。

英文翻譯

Why is the nobility in every corner of the world everywhere, whether it is the East or the West? What is the aristocracy? What is the civilian corresponding to the aristocracy? When the scholars of the Middle Eastern Han Dynasty passed the entire ruling class, On the other side of Eurasia, the rule of the Roman Empire has been dominated by the aristocrats of the Senate. Before this, ancient India had already had a very strict caste system. What kind of social common phenomenon is this? What to look at!

From the ancient books, we can know that Qi Zhonggong’s prime minister Guan Zhong is in favor of the aristocracy. Guan Zhong’s clear management of the division of soldiers, agriculture, industry and commerce after the prime minister, and stipulates that every family member, farmer, and Workers, businessmen, and occupations must be permanently fixed. Children and grandchildren cannot be beaten and beaten because they are interested in crafts, interest in poetry, books, rituals, music, sacred books, and interest in counting things to be able to part with the original occupation of the family. To do your favorite career, maybe everyone will think that Guan Zhong is doing this, not only depriving individual freedom, but also destroying the flow of talents in the whole society. Is Guan Zhong doing this right? But I want to talk to you, because of this. The family's occupation is fixed, so that a family's major is easy to get into orbit in each family member, and indirectly makes the country rich and powerful. For example, a child born in a merchant family is a child in the spoken language of adults. Growing up, the eyes of the child need to learn from other business books, how to buy and sell the skills? With this teacher without a teacher, so that it will become a bit Like today's professional SAR, in the professional field, the head of the family does not only have its own profession, but also has more professional experience and family identity for generations. This power is not only a matter of fact. Individuals who are part of the family say that their family will be proud, and they can play their own professionalism to the extreme in the whole country, because this profession is not just a personal profession and struggle, but the wisdom of the whole family. From another point of view, because of the strong sense of family identity, the recognition of the motherland will also be indirectly enhanced. The result is that the country is rich and strong, and everyone is willing to do their part to defend their country. This is a social talent. The flow can not be reached frequently, so it is easy to explain that Qi is rich and powerful under the management of Guanzhong. Isn’t the occupation of this kind of people, agriculture, industry and commerce fixed by the nobility? So the nobles are really bad. ?

You may have to ask aristocrats and nobles. I just talked about "family" and didn't talk about "expensive"! A "family" with only "family" and no "expensive" is not a nobleman! It is true. It is not a nobleman, but in fact, as long as the coherence and fixedness of the "family" is achieved, "expensive" is only a matter of time, because this coherence and fixed "family" must be the same under the general social competition. The single-handed person is even better, whether it is in terms of personal connections or professionalism, so it must be "expensive" and become "noble". The vernacular is the meaning of "a powerful family" rather than a "rich family." The meaning, because being a member of the nobility is not a kind of enjoyment, but a kind of responsibility, a sense of responsibility to continue to be strong, can not be interrupted or decayed, because the ancient Chinese emperor is a nobleman above the 10,000 people, but often It is also necessary to fight against the squatters.

The generation of aristocracy in the world is inevitable, because it is inevitable to use the abolition in the evolution of history. A strong family must overcome the single-handed opponent to become the ruler of the whole society, so why not hate the nobility, it is better to be in line with the nobility, to be, because the process of the aristocracy is worth learning.