現代與古代

我們真的活在現代嗎?當小編我翻開書本深度了解古代後,我發現「現代」並不是「現代」,因為在現代的世界裡,沒有一個是以前不曾有過的,像民主兩三千年前就存在於希臘了、國際的型態與國家的樣式也早在羅馬共和就訂了調、中國人的考試制度也早在以前的科舉制度、察舉制度就能看出其影子、現在的法治觀念更是由羅馬的十二銅表法與古巴比倫的漢摩拉比法典所塑造而來,所以與其說「現代」是「現代」,不如說「現代」其實是我們「熟悉的古代」,因為「現代」的所有軟件其實都是由古代的產物所建構的。

「現代」是「熟悉的古代」，醬話什麼又是「古代」呢！小編我為了找尋這答案，穿漢服、練劍、騎馬以貼近古代，使自己容入古代人的生活，到最後小編我發現什麼古代、現代的啊！在歷史的長河裡跟本不存在什麼絕對的現代，因為我們的現代有一天也會成為未來的古代，再說雖然古代的馬變現代的摩托車，古代的漢服變現代的牛仔褲與T-shirts ，但小編我發現人的人性從未因此而有所改變，舉個民族的例子，常常民族自身的民族性始終使同一個民族走上與古代相同的道路，像西方人愛好民主，愛好共和，古羅馬帝國走這道路，如今美利堅合眾國也走相同的道路，東方人從很古老就都有皇帝統治的觀念，使得如今日本走的還是君主立憲，中國走的還是專制，這一切的一切告訴我們歷史只在於過程的軌跡，而不在於強調現代與古代的差別，因為不管是大到民族，還是小到個人其實都是以一種追尋過往，重新看待過往的一種方式來迎接未來的，像西方人的文藝復興與東方人的理學誕生小編我都認為是由這種方式而來的。

「活在現代的世界，也活在古代的世界，因為我們活著的每一刻其實都在穿梭時空，穿梭於古代的因與現代的果」這句話是小編我讀歷史讀出的心得，更是小編我對整個世界的感受;有些人可能會問文化大革命、明治維新這種叛逆的表現與其思維也是古代就存在了嗎？其實真的古代就有了，中國的法家思維與焚書坑儒、胡服騎射就是證明，所以古代並不是全都是復古的份，其實也是有搞新潮、搞叛逆的份，因為不管是現代，還是古代，「活著」是大家共有的，而只要活著，活著所需的物品是不會有所改變的。

英文翻譯

Are we really living in modern times? When I edited the book in depth and learned about ancient times, I found that "modernity" is not "modern" because in the modern world, no one has ever been, like democracy. Two or three thousand years ago, it existed in Greece, the international style and the style of the country were also set up in the Roman Republic. The Chinese examination system can also see its shadow as early as the previous imperial examination system and inspection system. The current concept of the rule of law is shaped by the twelve bronze forms of Rome and the Hammurabi Code of Babylon. So it is not so much that "modern" is "modern". It is better to say that "modernity" is actually familiar to us. "Ancient", because all the software of "modern" is actually constructed by ancient products.

"Modern" is "familiar ancient", what is "ancient" in sauce? Xiaobian I am looking for this answer, wearing Hanfu, practicing swords, riding horses to stay close to ancient times, so that I can accommodate the life of ancient people, to the last small series I found ancient and modern! There is no absolute modernity in the long river of history, because our modern one day will become the ancient of the future, let alone the ancient horses become modern motorcycles, the ancient Chinese clothes become modern jeans and T-shirts, But Xiaobian I found that human nature has never changed. As a national example, often the nationality of the nation has always brought the same nation to the same path as ancient times. Like Westerners, they love democracy and love republic. The ancient Roman Empire took this road. Now the United States of America has followed the same path. The Easterners have the concept of emperor rule from an ancient age, so that today the Japanese are still constitutional, and China is still authoritarian. All this tells us history. It is only the trajectory of the process, not the emphasis on the difference between modern and ancient times, because whether it is a big nation or a small individual, it is actually a way of pursuing the past and revisiting the past to meet the future, like Westerners. The birth of the Renaissance and the science of the Orientals I think is from this way.

"Live in the modern world, and live in the ancient world, because every moment we live is actually traveling through time and space, and we are traveling through the ancient cause and the modern fruit." This is a small compilation of my reading history. It is also a small compilation of my feelings about the whole world; some people may ask the cultural revolution, the Meiji Restoration, the rebellious performance and its thinking also existed in ancient times? In fact, it was really ancient. The Chinese legalist thinking and the burning of books and the Confucianism and the Hufu riding and shooting are proofs. Therefore, ancient times were not all retro. In fact, there is also a new wave of rebellion, because it is modern. In ancient times, "living" is shared by all, and as long as you live, the items needed to live will not change.